Lotus*
#3,458 most common girls' name of all time · #5,907 across all names · 7% male / 93% female · used 1896–2025 · notable crossover
Rank among girls
#3,458
Rank overall
#5,907 of 105,966
First appeared
1896
Years on the list
101 of 146
All-time
2,978
Since 2016
1,264
Peak year
2021 #1,517
Best rank
#1,046 1896
Girls
Boys
peak 165/yr
Lotus first appears in 1896. That's the first year it was given to at least 5 US babies, which is the threshold below which the SSA withholds a name.
Year by year
| Year | Girls | Boys | Total | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 110 | 22 | 132 | #1,821 |
| 2024 | 125 | 20 | 145 | #1,649 |
| 2023 | 140 | 19 | 159 | #1,527 |
| 2022 | 117 | 14 | 131 | #1,765 |
| 2021 | 139 | 26 | 165 | #1,517 |
| 2020 | 86 | 12 | 98 | #2,120 |
| 2019 | 87 | 14 | 101 | #2,142 |
| 2018 | 101 | 8 | 109 | #1,954 |
| 2017 | 117 | 10 | 127 | #1,782 |
| 2016 | 90 | 7 | 97 | #2,151 |
| 2015 | 81 | — | 81 | #2,303 |
| 2014 | 93 | 5 | 98 | #2,086 |
| 2013 | 95 | 5 | 100 | #2,036 |
| 2012 | 69 | 5 | 74 | #2,602 |
| 2011 | 49 | 5 | 54 | #3,308 |
| 2010 | 52 | — | 52 | #3,164 |
| 2009 | 64 | 6 | 70 | #2,779 |
| 2008 | 52 | 5 | 57 | #3,228 |
| 2007 | 43 | — | 43 | #3,728 |
| 2006 | 32 | — | 32 | #4,470 |
| 2005 | 34 | 5 | 39 | #4,125 |
| 2004 | 24 | — | 24 | #5,217 |
| 2003 | 19 | — | 19 | #6,070 |
| 2002 | 19 | — | 19 | #5,915 |
| 2001 | 15 | — | 15 | #6,985 |
| 2000 | 12 | — | 12 | #8,064 |
| 1999 | 10 | — | 10 | #8,854 |
| 1998 | 10 | — | 10 | #8,628 |
| 1997 | 10 | — | 10 | #8,377 |
| 1995 | 9 | — | 9 | #8,823 |
| 1994 | 6 | — | 6 | #11,854 |
| 1993 | 5 | — | 5 | #13,555 |
| 1990 | 6 | — | 6 | #11,480 |
| 1988 | 5 | — | 5 | #11,918 |
| 1984 | 6 | — | 6 | #9,237 |
| 1983 | 5 | — | 5 | #10,388 |
| 1982 | 5 | — | 5 | #10,624 |
| 1981 | 5 | — | 5 | #10,528 |
| 1980 | 8 | — | 8 | #7,490 |
| 1977 | 6 | — | 6 | #8,544 |
| 1976 | 15 | — | 15 | #4,185 |
| 1973 | 10 | — | 10 | #5,237 |
| 1972 | 8 | — | 8 | #6,028 |
| 1971 | 7 | — | 7 | #6,720 |
| 1966 | 6 | — | 6 | #5,919 |
| 1965 | 5 | — | 5 | #6,651 |
| 1963 | 5 | — | 5 | #6,720 |
| 1960 | 7 | — | 7 | #5,249 |
| 1959 | 5 | — | 5 | #6,362 |
| 1958 | 5 | — | 5 | #6,225 |
| 1957 | 6 | — | 6 | #5,477 |
| 1956 | 8 | — | 8 | #4,532 |
| 1955 | 10 | — | 10 | #3,842 |
| 1954 | 10 | — | 10 | #3,775 |
| 1952 | 9 | — | 9 | #3,877 |
| 1951 | 10 | — | 10 | #3,539 |
| 1950 | 14 | — | 14 | #2,817 |
| 1948 | 14 | — | 14 | #2,740 |
| 1947 | 5 | — | 5 | #5,431 |
| 1946 | 13 | — | 13 | #2,778 |
| 1945 | 9 | — | 9 | #3,203 |
| 1944 | 6 | — | 6 | #4,170 |
| 1943 | 10 | — | 10 | #3,102 |
| 1942 | 10 | — | 10 | #3,054 |
| 1941 | 7 | — | 7 | #3,659 |
| 1940 | 15 | — | 15 | #2,146 |
| 1939 | 17 | — | 17 | #1,989 |
| 1938 | 11 | — | 11 | #2,640 |
| 1937 | 17 | — | 17 | #1,951 |
| 1936 | 13 | — | 13 | #2,329 |
| 1935 | 20 | — | 20 | #1,753 |
| 1934 | 16 | — | 16 | #2,034 |
| 1933 | 13 | — | 13 | #2,327 |
| 1932 | 21 | — | 21 | #1,715 |
| 1931 | 21 | — | 21 | #1,722 |
| 1930 | 12 | — | 12 | #2,601 |
| 1929 | 17 | — | 17 | #2,054 |
| 1928 | 18 | 6 | 24 | #2,063 |
| 1927 | 15 | — | 15 | #2,383 |
| 1926 | 22 | — | 22 | #1,859 |
| 1925 | 30 | — | 30 | #1,521 |
| 1924 | 21 | — | 21 | #1,957 |
| 1923 | 20 | 7 | 27 | #1,982 |
| 1922 | 25 | — | 25 | #1,709 |
| 1921 | 25 | 5 | 30 | #1,749 |
| 1920 | 20 | — | 20 | #1,983 |
| 1919 | 20 | — | 20 | #1,898 |
| 1918 | 17 | — | 17 | #2,170 |
| 1917 | 23 | — | 23 | #1,636 |
| 1916 | 28 | — | 28 | #1,400 |
| 1915 | 24 | 6 | 30 | #1,505 |
| 1914 | 16 | — | 16 | #1,716 |
| 1913 | 12 | — | 12 | #1,846 |
| 1912 | 12 | — | 12 | #1,689 |
| 1911 | 8 | — | 8 | #1,894 |
| 1909 | 6 | — | 6 | #2,090 |
| 1907 | 6 | — | 6 | #1,972 |
| 1902 | 5 | — | 5 | #1,941 |
| 1901 | 9 | — | 9 | #1,214 |
| 1897 | 5 | — | 5 | #1,743 |
| 1896 | 11 | — | 11 | #1,046 |